<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Profiling on My Blog</title><link>https://thaig2pro.github.io/en/tags/profiling/</link><description>Recent content in Profiling on My Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.146.0</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 09:00:00 +0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://thaig2pro.github.io/en/tags/profiling/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>I Explained a Slow Read and Wrote It Down. The Ratio That Disproved It Was Already in the Table.</title><link>https://thaig2pro.github.io/en/posts/cho-cham-khong-nam-o-cho-ban-doan-cap-phat-khong-phai-giai-ma/</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 09:00:00 +0700</pubDate><guid>https://thaig2pro.github.io/en/posts/cho-cham-khong-nam-o-cho-ban-doan-cap-phat-khong-phai-giai-ma/</guid><description>A 60-version row read 8.5x slower than a 1-version row. I blamed decoding, published that, and a month later a profiler showed the cost was allocation and copying: 5213 to 708 ns.</description></item></channel></rss>